Shariah finance has been labelled “copycat” for its reliance on debt funding
Reuters – KUALA LUMPUR, April 27 — When Kuwait Finance House Malaysia helped develop a US$1.3 billion (RM4.1 billion) real estate project in the country in 2005 as a partner in the deal, Islamic equity property ventures were a rarity.
Five years on, the bank is embarking on its fourth building project using a similar equity concept but few others in the industry want to follow the same path, reflecting Islamic finance’s slow and difficult shift away from debt instruments.
Debt funding’s dominance of Shariah finance has earned the US$1 trillion industry the tag of “copycat” and limited its growth as critics question its ability to offer a fairer way of sharing risks and rewards that truly distinguishes it from conventional banking.“Profit-sharing or equity structures are the true way of doing Islamic financing,” said Siti Mariam Mohd Desa, Kuwait Finance Malaysia’s real estate advisory director.
“It is a different concept because if you were to give out straight loans, you may as well go to a conventional bank.”
As the global financial system emerges from the debt crisis and banks shy away from assuming added risks, practitioners want Islamic finance to rely more on partnership structures and less on straight financing which they say has created a brand of finance which is Shariah compliant in form, but not in spirit.
They say equity financing such as musharaka and mudaraba are closer to the Shariah’s aim of ensuring gains and losses are shared equitably and a shift back to it would help banks win new business beyond its traditional markets.
As the global financial system emerges from the debt crisis and banks shy away from assuming added risks, practitioners want Islamic finance to rely more on partnership structures and less on straight financing which they say has created a brand of finance which is Shariah compliant in form, but not in spirit.
They say equity financing such as musharaka and mudaraba are closer to the Shariah’s aim of ensuring gains and losses are shared equitably and a shift back to it would help banks win new business beyond its traditional markets.
While Islamic finance has flourished in Muslim markets such as the Middle East and Malaysia, many non-Muslims are unconvinced, saying the industry differs from conventional banking only in name.
“We cannot add value in markets which are mimics of conventional markets. At the moment, it’s difficult to see the value-added,” said Safdar Alam, head of Islamic structuring at JP Morgan in Bahrain.
“We cannot add value in markets which are mimics of conventional markets. At the moment, it’s difficult to see the value-added,” said Safdar Alam, head of Islamic structuring at JP Morgan in Bahrain.
“It’s a real opportunity, with the increased awareness globally of Islamic finance, to demonstrate this value and the difference and benefits. This is a chance that we might miss if we don’t do this well quite quickly.”
But banks’ reluctance to bear the risk of projects funded, companies’ unwillingness to share profits and scarcity of banking capital make equity financing an unappealing proposition.
The recent property slump in the Gulf, where equity financing is more common, badly hit Islamic firms such as Bahrain’s Gulf Finance House and could compound banks’ fears of becoming project partners.
Kuwait Finance Malaysia, which uses the musharaka equity structure to develop real estate, had a non-performing financing level of 6.73 per cent in September, more than thrice the industry average.
Its parent Kuwait Finance House, the Gulf state’s top Islamic bank, posted a 24 per cent drop in net profit in 2009 to 118.74 million dinars.
Equity financing models were born out of a belief in Islam that the financier must share the risks if he wants the rewards and that profits should be earned through enterprise.
While equity funding is commonly associated with higher returns, bankers say it may not necessarily be more profitable than debt as the latter allows for higher leverage.
Traditionally, popular Islamic debt-based instruments such as istisna and murabaha have been likened to interest-based loans where banks take limited risks and are guaranteed a return.
But as Islamic finance grew beyond traditional roles such as agriculture financing to funding government budgets and billion dollar real estate projects, some banks began leaning more towards debt instruments to limit their risks.
As banks’ capital grows scarce, they will be wary of parting with large sums to back equity ventures, said Mohammad Faiz Azmi, PriceWaterhouseCoopers’s global Islamic finance leader.
“On the demand side, the issue are is there enough corporates who are essentially willing to give up the upside?” Faiz said, referring to profit-sharing structures.
“The reality is that the people that would want to have equity forms of financing are usually the ones that you want to avoid lending money to anyway.”
Some practitioners say the push for more Islamic equity financing is ill-conceived.
“From the shariah’s perspective, there is no such evidence to support (the view) that Islamic banks or whoever wants to do business should do profit-sharing more than debt-based,” said Shariah scholar Aznan Hasan, who advises Barclays Capital London and Malaysia’s stock exchange operator Bursa Malaysia.
“Whether it is debt or equity that suits you better, it depends on commercial and business decisions, not Shariah matters.” — Reuters
